Research Article

PRAGMATIC MARKERS IN THE SPOKEN DISCOURSE OF SELECTED UNIVERSITY UNDERGRADUATES IN KADUNA STATE UNIVERSITY

PAM, KEZIAH JONAH1*, OBINS, NUHU ISAAC2, ONOJA, ANDREW3
1 Department of English, University of Jos, Jos.
2 Department of General Studies, Nuhu Bamalli Polytechnic, Zaria, Samaru Kataf Campus
3 Department of English, University of Jos, Jos
* Corresponding author: keziahpam16@gmail.com
Published: Jan, 2025
DOI: 10.67862/hjjgs.2025.8trrosgt
Pages: 64-71

Abstract

Pragmatic markers (PMs) contribute in conversations to a great extent even though they have no significant relevance to the meaning of the communication content itself. Pragmatic markers such as you know, um, well, and actually play a vital role in structuring conversations, managing turn-taking, and maintaining social relationships. This study examines the use of pragmatic markers (PMs) in the spoken discourse of undergraduates at Kaduna State University (KASU), Kafanchan Campus. The study aims at exploring the complex roles that PMs play, especially in specific contexts, such as university settings, where students engage in diverse forms of discourse, ranging from casual peer interactions to formal academic discussions. The research adopts a mixed-method approach, combining both quantitative and qualitative analyses to investigate the frequency and functions of these markers in informal peer interactions and formal academic discussions. Data were collected through the recording of 20 hours of natural conversations across different contexts, followed by transcription and coding of the occurrences of specific PMs. The quantitative analysis reveals the predominant use of you know, um, and so in informal settings, while actually and I mean appear more frequently in formal academic contexts. The study observes gender-based differences with female students using hesitation markers more frequently than male students. The qualitative analysis highlights the social functions of PMs, including their role in signaling agreement, managing uncertainty, marking hesitation, and fostering social solidarity. The study contributes to the comprehension of PMs function in Nigerian university discourse, offering insights into their role in both informal communication and academic settings. The findings suggest that PMs are essential tools for managing social dynamics, maintaining conversational flow, and constructing academic identities. The study recommends further research on PM use in other Nigerian and African universities and suggests integrating pragmatic competence into language education programmes to improve students' communication skillsin both formal and informal contexts.

Keywords

Discourse Markers Hesitation Markers Pragmatic Markers Social Interaction

References

  1. Aijmer, Karin. English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. John Benjamins Publishing, 2002.
  2. Bamgbose, Ayo. Language and the Nation: The Language Question in Sub-Saharan Africa. Edinburgh University Press, 1991.
  3. Baxter, Judith. Discourse and Gender Identity: A Sociolinguistic Approach to Gender and Power in Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
  4. Coates, Jennifer. Women, Men and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language. 3rd ed., Routledge, 2016.
  5. Fillmore, Charles J. "Speech Acts and Semantic Structure." Linguistics, vol. 17, no. 1, 1979, pp. 36-47.
  6. Gale, Samantha, and Emily Smith. "Gendered Speech in Academic Settings: Pragmatics and Power Dynamics." Journal of Gender and Language, vol. 14, no. 3, 2020, pp. 62-78.
  7. Holmes, Janet. Women, Men and Politeness. Longman, 1995.
  8. Lennon, Paul. Pragmatic Markers and their Function in Discourse: New Approaches. Cambridge University Press, 2019.
  9. Mesthrie, Rajend. African Englishes. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
  10. Okpala, Ifeanyi. "Language and Education in Nigerian Universities." Nigerian Journal of Linguistics, vol. 15, no. 1, 2002, pp. 34-56.
  11. Omoniyi, Tope. The Sociolinguistics of Identity: Language, Culture, and Society in Africa. Multilingual Matters, 2007.
  12. Pauline Oghenekaro Adeniran and Uluma Onuoha. "Influence of Information Literacy Skills on Postgraduate Students' Use of Electronic Resources in Private University Libraries in South-Western Nigeria." Communication and Network, 10, 164-179, 2018, pp 164-179
  13. Schiffrin, Deborah. Discourse Markers. Cambridge University Press, 1987.
  14. Stenström, Anna-Brita. "Hedging and Solidarity in British English Conversation." The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Edited by Malcolm Coulthard, Blackwell, 1994, pp. 163-180.
  15. Stenström, Anna-Brita, Gisle Andersen, and Ingrid Kristine Hasund. Trends in Teenage Talk: Corpus Compilation, Analysis and Findings. John Benjamins Publishing, 2002.
  16. Wodak, Ruth. The Discourse of Power. Sage Publications, 2013.
  17. Yule, George. Pragmatics. Oxford University Press, 1996.
How to Cite

JONAH, P. K., ISAAC, O. N., & ANDREW, O. (2025). PRAGMATIC MARKERS IN THE SPOKEN DISCOURSE OF SELECTED UNIVERSITY UNDERGRADUATES IN KADUNA STATE UNIVERSITY. Humanity - Jos Journal Of General Studies, 16(1), 64-71. https://doi.org/10.67862/hjjgs.2025.8trrosgt

P. K. JONAH, O. N. ISAAC, and O. ANDREW, "PRAGMATIC MARKERS IN THE SPOKEN DISCOURSE OF SELECTED UNIVERSITY UNDERGRADUATES IN KADUNA STATE UNIVERSITY," Humanity - Jos Journal Of General Studies, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 64-71, January 2025. doi: 10.67862/hjjgs.2025.8trrosgt

Share this article:
Facebook X / Twitter LinkedIn
Download PDF View Full Text (PDF) Back to Articles