Research Article

Effect of Using Multiple Assessment Techniques on Chemistry Students' Performance in Problem Solving

1 Department of Religion and Philosophy, University of Jos, Jos
2 St Piran's High School, Jos
3 Department of Science and Tech Education, University of Jos.
* Corresponding author: gongdenej@yahoo.com
Published: Dec, 2017
Pages: 67-75

Abstract

Studies have shown that most Nigerian secondary school chemistry students have difficulty solving problems involving mole and stoichiometric calculations. The study was carried out to find out the effect of using multiple assessment techniques on secondary school chemistry students' performance in problem solving. The pretest-posttest-control group design was employed. Two instruments were developed, validated and used. They were: the chemistry achievement test (CAT, r = 0.80) and the mole and stoichiometry problem solving test (MASPST, r = 0.87). Eighty eight male and female students were randomly sampled from four secondary schools in Mangu LGA of Plateau state and randomly assigned into control and experimental groups. They were pre tested using the MASPST and instructed for four weeks, covering the mole concept and stoichiometry (including volumetric analysis). Students in the experimental  group were treated with a set of classwork, take home assignment, group assignment and written test every week but those in the control were only given an end of month test. At the end of the four weeks, both groups were post-tested using the MASPST and the scores analyzed using t-test (á = 0.05). The results of the MASPST show a significant difference between the mean scores of students in the control and those in the experimental group (in favor of the experimental group). The result also show a significant difference in the mean scores of male and female students taught in the experimental group. The study concluded that the use of multiple assessment techniques improves chemistry students' problem solving ability. It therefore recommended that chemistry teachers employ varieties of assessment techniques as part of instructional strategies to teach students problem solving in chemistry.   

References

  1. Adesoji, F. A., & Babatunde, A. G. (2008). Investigating gender difficulties and Misconception in inorganic chemistry at the senior secondary Level. International Journal of African and African-American Studies, 7 (1). Retrieved May 30, 2014 from www.ojcs.siue.edu
  2. Adigwe, J. C. (1992). Gender differences in chemical problem solving amongst Nigerian Students. Research in science and technological education, 10 (2), 1992
  3. Agbo, F. 2009. Strategies for improving science classroom assessment using the process-based approach. In Felicia Agbo (Ed), Proceedings of the the first Plateau Science Teachers' Association of Nigeria Conference (p11-18). Jos: Deka Enterprises (Nig)
  4. Ahiakwo, M. J. (1991). Cognitive style and students' problem-solving competence in chemistry. Journal of Science Teachers' Association of Nigeria, 27 (1), 31-40.
  5. Armagan, D., Sagir, S. U., & Celik, A.Y. (2009). The effects of students' problem solving skills on their understanding of chemical rates and their achievement on this issue. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 1 (1), 2678 - 2684.
  6. Awotunde, P. O. & Ugodulunwa, C. A. (2001). Issues in the organization and administration of continuous assessment in Nigerian secondary schools. In P.N Lassa and J. A. Aghenta (Eds), Proceedings of the 16th annual congress of the Nigerian Academy of Education, (pp18-28). Jos: Academy Congress Publication
  7. Baniabdelrahman, A. A. (2010). The effect of the use of self-assessment on EFL students' performance in reading comprehension in English. The electronic journal for English as a second language (TESL), 14 (2). Retrieved from www.tesl-ej.org on July 6, 2017 at 16:30
  8. Beskeni, R. D. (2009). Improving chemistry laboratory skills by assessing chemistry practical lessons. In Felicia Agbo (Ed), Proceeding of the the first Plateau Science Teachers' Association of Nigeria Conference, (pp19-27). Jos: Deka Enterprises (Nig)
  9. Casey, B. (2001). Spartial mechanical reasoning skills versus mathematics self-confidence as mediators of gender difference in mathematics subtests using cross-national gender-based items. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 32 (1), 28-37.
  10. Chollom, G. A. (2013). The effect of a training programme on the wait-time of basic primary five science teachers' questions. International Journal of Continuing Education, 6, 125-140
  11. Collins, J., & O'Brien, N. (2003). The Greenwood dictionary of education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
  12. Coopper, H., Robinson, J. C. and Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic advancement: A synthesis of research 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76, 1-62
  13. Crooks, T. (2001). The validity of formative assessment. Paper presented to The British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Leeds, 13-15 September, 2001. Retrieved Feb.24, 2007, from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001862.htm.
  14. Crippen, K. J., Brooks, D.W., & Courtright, R.D. (2000). Mole mapping. Science Teacher, 67 (7), 36-39.
  15. Davies, S. (2006). The essential guides to teaching. Edinburgh Gate: Pearson Educational Ltd
  16. Dhindsa, H. S. & Chung, G. (1999). Motivation, anxiety, enjoyment and values associated with chemistry learning among form 5 Bruneian students. Paper presented at the MERA-ERA joint conference, Malacca, Malaysia.
  17. Dhindsa, H. S. & Emran, S. (2011). Using interactive whiteboard technology-rich Constructivist learning environment to minimize gender differences in chemistry achievement. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6, (4), 393-414.
  18. Eke, G. E. (2008). Regulatory mechanisms for sound chemicals management. A paper presented at the first mandatory training workshop of ICCON in Lagos, Nigeria.
  19. Ezeudu, F. O. (2000). The use of local material in the teaching of chemistry. Proceedings of the 41st Conference of the Science Teachers' Association of Nigeria, 163-165.
  20. Federal Ministry of Education. (2008). National policy on education. Lagos: NERDC press.
  21. Festus, C. & Ekpete, O. A. (2012). Improving students' performance and attitude towards chemistry through problem-based solving techniques, PBST. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 1 (1). Retrieved on July 6, 2017 from http://www.hrmars.com
  22. Gabel, D. (2003a). Problem solving in chemistry: Research matters to the science teacher. Retrieved June, 12 2013 from www.narst.org/publications/research/problem.cfm
  23. Gongden, E. J. (1998). Analysis of the senior secondary two chemistry syllabus to determine areas of difficulty. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Jos.
  24. Gongden, E.J. (2015). Comparative effects of two metacognitive instructional strategies on gender and students' problem-solving abilities in selected chemistry concepts. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi
  25. Gongden, E. J. and Delmang, T. K. (2016). The efficacy of concept mapping instructional strategy in remedying students' problem-solving difficulties in stoichiometry. Journal of African Research Review, 10 (2), s/no 41, 144-157
  26. Inyang, N.,& Jegede, O. J. (1991). Development, validation and standardization in Integrated science among secondary school students. International Review of Education, 36 (3), 310-319.
  27. Jimoh, A. T. (2004). Influence of gender difference on students' achievement in chemistry. Nigerian Journal of Educational Studies and Research, 2 (1), 88-94.
  28. Joshi, S. R. (2005). Teaching of science. New Delhi: A. P. H Publishing Corporation Daryagong
  29. Kolomuç, A. & Tekin, S. (2011). Chemistry teachers' misconceptions concerning concept of chemical reaction rate. Eurasian Journal of Physics Chemistry Education, 3 (2), 84-101
  30. Kumar, D.D., & Helgeson, S. (2000). The effects of gender on computer-based chemistry problem solving: Early findings. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 4 (4). Retrieved May 5, 2014 from http://wolfweb.unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/kumaretal.html
  31. Mosadomi, W. (2014). Analysis of the 2012 November/December NECO examination. Retrieved June 4, 2014 from http://www.vanguardngr.com/2013/03/neco-release.
  32. Mustapha, A. Y. & Tumba, H. I. (2013). An appraisal of continuous assessment competence of secondary school teachers in Mubi zone of Adamawa state. International Journal of Continuing Education, 6, 159-166
  33. National Teachers' Institute. (2000). Primary education studies cycle I. Kaduna:
  34. Njoku, Z. C. (2003). Teaching the mole concept creatively: A realistic approach towards students' mastery of chemical calculations. The Nigerian Teacher Today, 11 (1), 109-116
  35. Olorundare, A., & Aderogba, G A. (2009). Comparative effects of concept mapping, analogy and expository strategies on secondary school students' performance in chemistry in Ilesha, Nigeria Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 7 (1 & 2). Retrieved July 25, 2014 from www.unilorin.edu.ngon
  36. Ozkaya, A. R. (2002). Conceptual difficulties experienced by prospective teachers in Electrochemistry: half cell potential and chemical and electrochemical equilibrium in galvanic cells. Journal of Chemical Education, 79 (6), 735-738.
  37. Santrock, J. W. (2009). Educational psychology (4 ed). Texas: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc
  38. Shuaibu, A. A. M., & Mari, J. S (1997). Gender related difference in the understanding of science process skills amongst junior secondary school students in some Nigerian schools. Journal of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 32 (1 and 2), 21-27.
  39. Stiggins, R. (2001). Student-involved classroom assessment (3 ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall
  40. Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S., Schelfhout, W., and Gielen, S. (2006). The overall effects of end-of-course assessment on students' performance: A comparison between multiple choice testing, peer assessment, case-based assessment and portfolio assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32 (3), 202-222
  41. Taber, K. S. & Coll, R. K. (2002). Bonding. In Gilbert J. K., De Jong O., Justi R., Treagust D. F., Van Driel J. H. (Eds), Chemical education: towards research-based practice. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 213-234
  42. Trautwein, U. (2007). Homework achievement relation reconsidered: Differentiating homework time, homework frequency and homework effort. Learning and Instruction, 17, 371-378
  43. Udofia, T. M. & Udo, M. E. (2006). Plant dyes: A resource for effective teaching and learning of titrimetric analysis in chemistry. In U. Nzewi (Ed.), Resources for science, technology and mathematics (STM) education. Proceedings of the 47th annual conference of the STAN, (pp167-172). Calabar: STAN
  44. Udousoro, U. J. (2011). The effects of gender and mathematics ability on academic performance of students in chemistry. African Research Review, 5 (4), 201-213
  45. Viko, J. B. N. (2010). Effect of instruction in metacognitive self-assessment strategy on chemistry students' self-efficacy and achievement. Academia Arena, 2 (11), Retrieved from http://www.sciencepub.net on July 6, 2017 at 17:28.
  46. Walding, R. R. (2002). Sex differences in chemical problem solving. Doctoral dissertation, Griffith University, Australia
  47. Yell, M. (2008). No child left behind. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 105-120
How to Cite

J, G. E., E, G. E., & P, J. D. (2017). Effect of Using Multiple Assessment Techniques on Chemistry Students' Performance in Problem Solving. Humanity - Jos Journal Of General Studies, 9(1), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.67862/hjjgs.2017.01pgbo4e

G. E. J, G. E. E, and J. D. P, "Effect of Using Multiple Assessment Techniques on Chemistry Students' Performance in Problem Solving," Humanity - Jos Journal Of General Studies, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 67-75, December 2017. doi: 10.67862/hjjgs.2017.01pgbo4e

Share this article:
Facebook X / Twitter LinkedIn